26horses Forum
0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this board.
  • Ethan2266
  • Irregular
  • 8 posts
  • Reputation 5
  • Honourable
    Dishonourable
  • I love 26horses Productions
Feb 13 2014 2:18 am

Maybe I'm just ignorant, but I don't understand the rate at which Naq is produced.

For example, on my brother's account he's getting roughly 9.5 per cycle. A cycle, I was told, is ten minutes. So, after twelve hours of production, why is it that he only got 680+ Naq instead of the 6,840 the math says he should get? Was I misled on the length of a cycle, or is there something wrong with the production system's algorithm?


  • Scurvydog2
  • Irregular
  • 50 posts
  • Reputation 4
  • Honourable
    Dishonourable
  • i think shadowing should act like an ancient
Feb 13 2014 2:21 am

each cycle is 10 min so 6 cycles per hr 6*12=72 72 cycles*9.5naq/cycle=685. you brother has the correct amount


fighting for the players right to choose how they play
  • Masterstickboy
  • Irregular
  • 22 posts
  • Reputation 10
  • Honourable
    Dishonourable
  • I love 26horses Productions
Feb 13 2014 2:21 am

yes your math is off, you should take 9.5 times 6 (to equal the amount in 1 hours) then by 12 so 684 is the correct number... even at 38 per cycle it would take 24 hours to make 5472


  • Binar
  • Irregular
  • 84 posts
  • Reputation 24
  • Honourable
    Dishonourable
  • Hakuna Matatta
Feb 13 2014 2:22 am

Your math is wrong. 9.5(cycle production)x6(6 cycles per hour)x12 hours is 684. The daily rate would be 1368 for 24 hours at that cycle rate...


I am Binar
  • Ethan2266
  • Irregular
  • 8 posts
  • Reputation 5
  • Honourable
    Dishonourable
  • I love 26horses Productions
Feb 13 2014 2:33 am

Oh, for some idiotic reason I was doing sixty times twelve instead of six. I knew the cycles were ten minutes, but my brain kept substituting ten minutes for one when I did the math. Well, now I feel like a fool. Good thing my old AP math teachers didn't see this brainfart.

Apologies, and thank you all for correcting my blunder.