0 Members and 1 Guests are viewing this board.
- Demogorgon
- Enthusiast

- 224 posts
- Reputation 109
-
Honourable
Dishonourable
- I love 26horses Productions
Feb 01 2014 12:39 am
I think that when we destroy our buildings we should receive a % back. It makes no sense to have to build something and then destroy it and not be able to use any of the used material.
- Shadowing
- Devoted

- 1486 posts
- Reputation 255
-
Honourable
Dishonourable
- Captain of the boat or captain of the Sea?
Feb 01 2014 12:41 am
The main reason why I thought it was a good idea to do it this way so players can't easily change their strategy 4 times in a given week. so idk
What ever you can do or dream you can always begin it because boldness has genius, power and magic in it
- Demogorgon
- Enthusiast

- 224 posts
- Reputation 109
-
Honourable
Dishonourable
- I love 26horses Productions
Feb 01 2014 12:58 am
If I spend 14 Naqahdah on a house and then destroy it, getting back 25% of it only gives me 3.5 back. To me that’s not much. As far as changing strategy a few times I see nothing wrong with it. I recommend asking people’s opinion on the matter.
- Shade3130
- Irregular

- 71 posts
- Reputation 24
-
Honourable
Dishonourable
- Guess my real identity.
Feb 02 2014 7:14 pm
i like the suggestion.
not much gotten back to affect strategy changing at current pace. we spend more then we get.
in war, its probably best to incorporate the %back feature suggest by OP. Because if changing a minor detail can save a player from resetting/getting killed off it would help to add it.
1) i don't see why hinder a players ability to change strategy since it's a strategy game.
2) no signifcant naq production as is.
3) %back for building destruction will probably only give enough to make some jaffas, barely.
You guys must really hate me....
- Demogorgon
- Enthusiast

- 224 posts
- Reputation 109
-
Honourable
Dishonourable
- I love 26horses Productions
Feb 03 2014 2:41 am
Thank you Shade I agree with all your points. I had all the same feelings.