26horses Forum

Siege worlds - slaves

0 Members and 1 Guests are viewing this board.
  • Roboben1
  • Irregular
  • 28 posts
  • Reputation 8
  • Honourable
    Dishonourable
  • I love 26horses Productions
Dec 14 2014 10:46 am

When sieging the user can bombard, take over, trade or call for reinforcements.

What I propose is that the user can ‘trade’ the slaves off the sieged world to another.

Currently the user cannot do this.

Steps:
Attack and Siege a world with slaves on it
Click and view one of your planets
Click trade
Select the (Siege tab) select a world
Enter the amount of slaves
Send.

‘Spoils of war’

  • Cjamieson99
  • Respected
  • 640 posts
  • Reputation 203
  • Honourable
    Dishonourable
  • LET'S GET THOSE TERRORISTS!
Dec 14 2014 10:58 am

Makes it too easy to feed off of inactives. I have 19 war sats and 1 disposable world for this very reason. Every 3 days when I need it I take a planet with 100k slaves and send them to a keeper.

I see nothing wrong with this, and I think it makes the game slightly more difficult.

Kelac! #1 cheater in the game, but you'll never catch me!
  • Roboben1
  • Irregular
  • 28 posts
  • Reputation 8
  • Honourable
    Dishonourable
  • I love 26horses Productions
Dec 14 2014 11:02 am

No i understand that.

Maybe have a % of total taken and the rest wiped out or something.

TBH i don't think you should be able to do what you said. I world shouldn't 'fall in line' to it's new owner. Again maybe % is wiped out.

  • Cjamieson99
  • Respected
  • 640 posts
  • Reputation 203
  • Honourable
    Dishonourable
  • LET'S GET THOSE TERRORISTS!
Dec 14 2014 11:55 am

Many have the plague. Take one of those over and you get the plague, your planets go to 50%.

Kelac! #1 cheater in the game, but you'll never catch me!
  • Excellion
  • Enthusiast
  • 296 posts
  • Reputation 118
  • Honourable
    Dishonourable
  • Never back down, never surrender, no fear
Dec 14 2014 12:52 pm

Trading slaves has already been introduced, and it is a really bad move.

The entire concept of requiring slaves to create military units was introduced to present a challenge in the game. Players need to manage slaves. Now, that has been taken away.

Until now, there was no purpose with having inactive players in your ally. Now there is. Have the player log in once every couple weeks and trade their naq and ally to active players.

Game has taken a big step backwards and has lowered the competitiveness. It is now more about numbers than gaming skill.

To be clear, I am personally fine with the change. I will thrive with this change, the increase in flagship attack points and such, but they couldn't be worse for the player base.

One strong player can now go through and wipe player after player from the game and be refueled by getting slaves from others. The "others" will be innocent bystanders who aren't launching the attacks, but they enable them.

I hunt the sheep of war...
  • Cjamieson99
  • Respected
  • 640 posts
  • Reputation 203
  • Honourable
    Dishonourable
  • LET'S GET THOSE TERRORISTS!
Dec 15 2014 2:30 am

I agree with everything Excellion just said.

I love this new naq trading thing, I'm having lots of fun with it, but it's bad for the overall player base and game.

Kelac! #1 cheater in the game, but you'll never catch me!